Hello, I am very happy to find a group interested in develop de RLO concept. I am very happy also because the RLO concept that they explain on this brief introduction matches with the concept we have been working for the last two years on a LO network in Colombia.
We defined LO is a digital, self-contained, reusable entity with a clear learning aim that must contains at least three internal editable components: content, instructional activities (learning activities), and context elements. As a complement, the learning object should have an external component of information which helps its identification, storage, and recovery: the metadata.
We are now fighting for creating a clear identification of LO as open educational resources because we believe that, first, knowledge is a world´s patrimony and second because this is a good way to ensure, or at least, to facilitate LO reusability.
I understand that they propose that reusability is based on using pedagogical patterns that supports a certain “knowledge layer”, and this certainly facilitate to make changes in the information stored on this layer. I have a question I would like to ask about pedagogical patterns. How could you know efficiency of a proved pedagogical pattern remains when learning context or content change?
Andrés Chiappe´s Blog- Learning Objects - Objetos de Aprendizaje
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario